I am using ABP dev build 2.0.4b.3043 with Firefox Nightly 20120410 on Win7 Enterprise x64 sp1.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Go en/
2. Add ##body ,page content is hided.
3. Add ~adblockplus.org##body then refresh. Page content isn't hided now (but it shoud be).
4. disable ##body , then enable it.
5. Refresh the Page. Content is hided again.
6. disable ~adblockplus.org##body , then enable it.
7. Refresh the Page. Page content isn't hided now, but it shoud be.
I believe ##body should hide everything even there is another filter like ~adblockplus.org##body.
So could you fix it?Thanks.
Bug of element hiding rules
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:53 am
- Location: Taiwan
Bug of element hiding rules
Last edited by knight00931 on Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 5:24 pm
- Location: Wonderful World, Ubuntu Linux
- Contact:
Re: bug of element hiding rules
I actually would like to have opposite thing like hide merging functionality.
So if we have 3 rules:
#body
~adblockplus.org,~another.site##body
~something.else,~another.site##body
they will be represented as ~adblockplus.org,~another.site,~something.else##body
This function must not merge '~domain' and 'domain' rules! So if we have rule domain.name##body then it must not be merged with exceptions.
Such functionality will allow to make exceptions for hiding rules from main subscription in regional subscriptions without necessity to modify main subscription.
So if we have 3 rules:
#body
~adblockplus.org,~another.site##body
~something.else,~another.site##body
they will be represented as ~adblockplus.org,~another.site,~something.else##body
This function must not merge '~domain' and 'domain' rules! So if we have rule domain.name##body then it must not be merged with exceptions.
Such functionality will allow to make exceptions for hiding rules from main subscription in regional subscriptions without necessity to modify main subscription.
Re: Bug of element hiding rules
I agree with Lain_13. In fact, I even make a feature request about whitelist existing rule...( I even come up with a not so well implement.)
forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=9660
why would you want that? It would helpful for us, making Easylist false positive rule ( in non-English regions ) inactivate accurately instead of putting a universal whitelist like $elemhide.
forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=9660
why would you want that? It would helpful for us, making Easylist false positive rule ( in non-English regions ) inactivate accurately instead of putting a universal whitelist like $elemhide.
Last edited by dindog on Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:53 am
- Location: Taiwan
Re: Bug of element hiding rules
I am now talking about a BUG, the same filters but different behavior.
If you have any suggestions, just use another topic, OK?
If you have any suggestions, just use another topic, OK?
Last edited by knight00931 on Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Bug of element hiding rules
err.. it probably relates to the recent change that make pattern.ini async