Can inline images be blocked?

Posting here is no longer possible, please use the forum of a filter list project, such as EasyList
Locked
Willem

Can inline images be blocked?

Post by Willem »

Now HTML 5 is on the way, there is a nasty load of privacy-slaughtering "features" coming towards us. And off course ads are part of the standard. Where previous HTML versions required images to have an address, HTML 5 has inline images to circumvent this (I think, I read it before in the HTML 5 standard but cannot find it back). Is there a way to block inline images by default?
For an example of inline images, see:
http://iescripts.org/help/embeddedimage.html
Dr. Evil
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:51 pm

Post by Dr. Evil »

Since there is no extra download, the image cannot be blocked. But the html tag can be hidden with element hiding rules.

Btw, this has nothing to do with html 5 or ads. The RFC for data uris is from 1998, and they can be quite useful for lots of things. Also, if there no extra download from an ad server, privacy actually increases.
Wladimir Palant

Post by Wladimir Palant »

Willem, Firefox has always been supporting data: URIs - and before it Mozilla Suite. So this has nothing to do with HTML 5 (or with privacy).
ecjs
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:39 pm

Post by ecjs »

But I believe HTML 5 video and audio tags could become a problem, don't you think so ?
Ares2
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:47 pm

Post by Ares2 »

They are blockable with ABP since http://adblockplus.org/development-buil ... ed-filters which is a dev-build of ABP 1.0.1.
ziutek

Post by ziutek »

I may be mistaken, but I think the previous code would block them as well, and the only difference is that they are now classified as 'media' instead of 'other'.
Ares2
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:47 pm

Post by Ares2 »

OK, it should be: "They are blockable in Firefox 3.5 since this bug has been fixed: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451004 "

This was after ABP 1.0.1 was released, but if you would use ABP 1.0 with Firefox 3.5, I think they would show as "other", right.
ecjs
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:39 pm

Post by ecjs »

Thanks for the info. :)
Locked