That's not very nice. I think it's informative and well-written. It's not horrible if you don't agree with it or don't understand it.Capacitor wrote:I've read it. the document is horrible.
For them, I would recommend subscribing to a filter subscription.Capacitor wrote:there's no way users are going to do this.
You're free to do whatever you want. Just please be polite.Capacitor wrote:I certainly won't.
There's nothing wrong with using code from 0.5.x, but the topic has been covered exhaustively in the History/FAQ.Capacitor wrote:what's wrong with using the code from v0.5.11.4 ?
It's trivial to get 0.5.x working under Firefox 2. There are several ways to do this, but the easiest way for you is to use Nightly Tester Tools to make it compatible.Capacitor wrote:are there any serious concerns with porting it to FF v2 ?
Check out Remove it Permanently (RIP). It's an extension that better matches your style of removing content. Unfortunately, it is incompatible with Firefox 2. But as I've mentioned before, it's trivial to get it working properly.
Your reactions mirrored the reactions of many people when the Adblock Plus name was transferred from mcm_ham to Wladimir. Eventually, the negative feelings subsided and many people have come to appreciate the current version of Adblock Plus. In fact, it will be a featured extension on Mozilla Add-ons for the Firefox 2 release.